European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society Meeting, 4 & 5 May 2000, London: Abstracts and Poster Presentations and Nurses Symposium

نویسنده

  • S. Bielack
چکیده

s 107 mean age of 19 years (range 6–50). The mean follow-up was 39 months (range 7–120 months). The vast majority had clear resection margins. Histological response was category 1 in 27% of the patients, and category 2 in 73%. Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis were analysed. Survival rates were examined using Kaplan–Meier Analysis. Results: The average interval between the first resection and local recurrence was 15 months (range 2–109 months). Forty-one patients (76%) had local recurrence in deep soft tissue, seven in bone, and six in subcutaneous tissue. Twenty-six patients (49%) had lung metastasis at the time of local recurrence, whilst 21 patients (38%) developed it later. Thirty patients (57%) were treated with resection of the recurrent lesion and 18 (32%) were treated with amputation. One-, 3and 5-year survival rates after local recurrence were 0.57, 0.38, and 0.22, respectively. Conclusion: (1) 87% of patients with local recurrence developed metastases either concurrently or at a later date. Immediate amputation did achieve local tumour control. However, the survival rate was not statistically higher; (2) 87% of the local recurrence arise in soft tissue. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to secure the wide margin around biopsy tract, muscle insertion to the affected bone, and neurovascular bundle at the time of initial resection. Prognosis after recurrence of osteosarcoma. A COSS report on 547 patients with relapse following complete remission B. Kempf-Bielack1, D. Branscheid, S. Flege, M. Kevric, R. Maas, H. Jürgens, & S. Bielack for the Cooperative OsteoSarcoma Study Group COSS. (1Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University Muenster, Germany) Introduction: The COSS-database was used to evaluate the prognosis after osteosarcoma relapse and to determine whether prognostic factors influencing survival post-relapse might be identified. Patients and methods: Among all patients with previously untreated high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremity or trunk registered into a neoadjuvant COSS-study before 7/98, 547 patients relapsed after having previously achieved a complete surgical remission. These were evaluated for patientand tumor-related characteristics identifiable at time of relapse which might influence post-relapse survival. Results: The median interval from diagnosis of osteosarcoma to relapse was short at 1.5 (0.1–10.3) years. One hundred and nineteen relapses were detected in the first, 242 in the second, 108 in the third, 36 in the fourth, 18 in the fifth year, and only 24 later. Median follow-up post-relapse was 1.0 year for all patients and 1.8 (0–17.3) years for 174 survivors. Three hundred and seventy-three patients died, 359 of osteosarcoma, 11 of other and three of unknown causes. Actuarial survival at 2, 5, and 10 years postrelapse was 34.4, 20.6, and 15.1%. Survival post-relapse did not correlate significantly with patient age or sex, the former site or size of the primary tumor, whether primary metastases had been present, or with tumor response to first-line chemotherapy. The probability to survive increased with increasing time between diagnosis and relapse (5-year survival 9.2% if interval < 1.5 years; 32.1% if 3 1.5 years). Five-year survival was 30.8% for 34 patients with isolated local recurrences and 21.3% for 481 patients with metastases only, but only 3.5% for 32 patients with combined local and systemic recurrences. Metastases involved the lung in 444 (355 as only site of relapse: 5-year survival 24.3%), distant bones in 88 (44 bone only: 23.6%) and other sites in 54 patients (11 other sites only: 20.0%). Five-year survival was dismal at 4.8% for patients with involvement of more than one system (local/lung/ bone/other), compared to 24.5% if only one system was involved. Conclusion: Survival following osteosarcoma relapse remains poor. Risk factors pointing to a high relapse risk after frontline therapy are generally unsuitable to predict outcome following relapse. A short latency period between diagnosis and recurrence and involvement of multiple locations at relapse identify a population with particularly unsatisfactory results. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe Post relapse survival in 159 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity S. Ferrari, A. Briccoli, S. Rimondini, M. Mercuri, P. Picci, A. Tienghi1, A. Brach Del Prever2, A. Comandone3 & G. Bacci (Dipartimento di Oncologia Muscolo-Scheletrica Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli; 1Oncologia Medica Ravenna; 2Clinica Pediatrica Università di Torino; 3Oncologia Medica Ospedale, Gradenigo Torino, Italy) An analysis of prognostic factors for survival was performed in 159 patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity who relapsed from 1986 to 1997. They had received a combined treatment with surgery of the primary lesion and neoadjuvant chemotherapy delivered according to four protocols based on high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin and standard dose ifosfamide. The median relapse-free interval (RFI) was 23.6 months (1.9–98.3 months). One hundred and twenty-three (77%) patients relapsed only with lung metastases (monolateral 77, bilateral 46; median number of lung nodules, 3), 36 (23%) patients had recurrence also in other sites; 111 (70%) patients were free of disease after adequate surgical treatment; 85 (53%) patients received a second line chemotherapy treatment, based on high-dose Ifosfamide (15 g/m2, 5-day continuous infusion) in 50 (59%) of them. The estimated 5-year survival after relapse (S) was 27.5%. Univariate analysis identified the site of relapse (lung 5-year S 32%, other 12%, p < 0.003), RFI ( £ 24 months 5-year S 13%, > 24 months 5-year S 46%, p < 0.001), the site of lung metastases (monolateral 5-year S 37%, bilateral 17%, p < 0.001) and the number of lung metastases ( £ 2 nodules 5-year S 57%, > 2 nodules 5-year S 10%, p < 0.0001) as predictive factors for S. Chemotherapy offered a significant advantage only in patients with > 2 pulmonary nodules ( with chemotherapy 5-year S 17 %, without chemotherapy 5-year S 0%, p = 0.002), whereas no significant differences were seen in patients with one/two pulmonary nodules (42 vs. 62%, p = 0.46). A longer survival time and a higher 5-year S was seen in patients with other than lung metastases who received chemotherapy (with chemotherapy 5-year S 22%, without chemotherapy 5-year S 0%, p = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis including only patients with lung metastases the number of nodules ( £ 2 nodules RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.15–0.49, p < 0.0001) and RFI ( £ 24 months RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.3–3.7, p < 0.005) were predictive factors for S. About 25% of patients with recurrent osteosarcoma can be rescued. Lung location, a > 24-month relapse-free interval, £ 2 pulmonary nodules are positive predictive factors which identify patients who can be treated with surgery only. More than two pulmonary nodules and other than lung location identify poor risk patients who can have benefit from chemotherapy. Radiation induced bone sarcoma: a review of the EMSOS database H. Patterson & J.S. Whelan on behalf of EMSOS Data were sought from six centres; 65 patients (31 male and 34 female) were identified who satisfied the criteria for the diagnosis of radiation induced bone sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis of the condition for which the patient received their radiotherapy was 20 years (range 3 months to 66 years), and the most frequent diagnoses were Ewing’s sarcoma (13 patients), giant cell tumour (eight patients), breast cancer (seven patients), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (five patients), retinoblastoma (four patients) and primary bone lymphoma (three patients). The median age at

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ON : Proceedings of the 11 th Annual Symposium of the London Hypertension Society New themes in hypertension

The London Hypertension Society provides a forum for basic scientists, clinical researchers, epidemiologists and public health experts to present and discuss results of their research into cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. The Society holds evening scientific meetings at the Medical Society of London five times a year during academic terms with speakers on research from throughou...

متن کامل

Conference report on the 28th annual meeting of the European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society, 29 April–1 May 2015, Athens

The 28th Annual Meeting of the European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society was organised in Athens by the local host Professor Papagelopoulos and his team. The main objective of the meeting was to focus on recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. The interdisciplinary nature of the meeting was of great value-surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologist...

متن کامل

Publication outcomes of the abstracts presented at the 2011 European Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculo-Skeletal Diseases (ECCEO-IOF11)

Summary The publication outcomes of the abstracts presented during the ECCEO-IOF 2011 reflect a high research productivity, support the robustness of the selection process conducted by the Scientific Advisory Committee and suggest that IOF-ESCEO WCO is successful in its mission to promote and disseminate research. Background and Objective The European (now World) Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteo...

متن کامل

Who? What? Where? A snapshot of Nuclear Medicine Research Presentations from recent ANZSNM conferences in Australia and New Zealand.

Objective(s): The aims of this study were to: 1) discover location (by city) of contributors to poster and oral presentations at recent ANZSNM conferences; 2) determine the nuclear medicine themes most commonly explored; 3) establish institutions producing the highest number of oral and poster abstracts and 4) determine publication rates of conference abstracts to full...

متن کامل

Do we publish what we preach? Analysis of the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow Congress publication rates

BACKGROUND Scientific congresses have become the most expedient method to communicate novel findings on any research topic. However, an important question is whether this information will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Our aim was to determine the publication rate of the abstracts presented at the European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow Congress and analyze factors that ...

متن کامل

Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Selective nonpublication will yield publication bias and a published literature imperfectly representative of the full range of scientific findings. We evaluated the proportion of research abstracts presented at the leading United States research meeting in stroke, the International Stroke Conference (ISC), which were subsequently published as full-length articles and inv...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Sarcoma

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001